[Mishmash] So what do you think
Hugh Gigante
hgigante at optonline.net
Fri Jan 25 03:53:30 CST 2008
Its not a rebate . . .its a new transfer payment.
I cringe everytime one of those fools in DC talks about government giving anyone anything . . .everything government had was taken from someone in the first place.
Hugh
----- Original Message -----
From: Carole
To: Mishmash
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 8:14 PM
Subject: Re: [Mishmash] So what do you think
yes, what do you think of this new rebate deal the flaming liberals have changed so that those that don't pay taxes will be getting that rebate. excuse me - most of those not paying taxes are already receiving a child tax credit rebate that can be $2000+ more than what ever taxes they ever paid in for the year. ah yes, it is the socialist state all over again. i'm glad i'm old and probably only have about 15 or 20 years left; but i fear for my grandkids and my kids too for that matter. makes me wonder why all the money was spent on college educations so that they could better themselves. if they just lay back, do nothing more productive than having more kids to put on the welfare roles they could receive free money from taxes paid by others.
-------Original Message-------
From: Hugh Gigante
Date: 1/24/2008 6:59:50 PM
To: Mishmash
Subject: Re: [Mishmash] So what do you think
My politics are just a bit to the conservative side of Rush Limbaugh. From that position, all of them are democrats . . . or at least flaming liberals hell bent on transfering wealth from those who earn it to those who don't.
----- Original Message -----
From: Carole
To: Mishmash
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 6:36 PM
Subject: Re: [Mishmash] So what do you think
so....our only choice is to vote democrat? i think not. (yes, mccain is almost a democrat). but i think your last thot is the best - no congress either - especially no congress.
-------Original Message-------
From: Hugh Gigante
Date: 1/24/2008 2:59:05 PM
To: Mishmash
Subject: [Mishmash] So what do you think
OK, looks like we are facing some interesting choices:
* One option is someone who has no executive experience, but claims to have by osmosis while in bed with a former president/governor
* Another who really has no experience on any level
* A third who has years of experience deciding what should be done, but very little actually getting anything to happen
The only issues all of them seem to center on are age, sex, and race. None of those have anything to do with experience or competence. Sounds to me like we're going to elect someone following affirmative action rules, not any kind of logic.
Can we just leave the white house empty for four years? Maybe that way nothing will get done, and nobody will be bothered.
Hugh
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Mishmash mailing list
Mishmash at mishmash.net
http://mishmash.net/mailman/listinfo/mishmash_mishmash.net
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Mishmash mailing list
Mishmash at mishmash.net
http://mishmash.net/mailman/listinfo/mishmash_mishmash.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mishmash.net/pipermail/mishmash_mishmash.net/attachments/20080125/bd72431b/attachment-0001.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: imstp_usa1.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 18861 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mishmash.net/pipermail/mishmash_mishmash.net/attachments/20080125/bd72431b/attachment-0001.gif
More information about the Mishmash
mailing list